|

March 17, 2007
Our
attitude is the primary force that will determine whether we succeed or
fail.
--John C. Maxwell
For
the returns that our two unique investment strategies have delivered,
check out
the
chart and tables below.
A Correction?
Be
Free’s two unique investment strategies both had pullbacks in February.
The INCOME strategy was down 1.6% and STOCKS PLUS investors suffered a
2.9% drop in capital. The wild late-month action in the stock market did
not play to our favor and was responsible for both strategies pulling
back. Even so, the two strategies combined have had 26 winning months
in their last 32.
A
few INCOME strategy clients have wondered why when many market observers
had been expecting a pullback, Be Free wasn't positioned to capitalize
on it. That is probably most easily answered by pointing to the
column I wrote last month. I acknowledged that a correction might be in
the offing, but trading and investing are always bedeviling and more
difficult than just having an idea; my timing was bad and my estimation
that it would be slower and not accompanied by as big and as sudden a
spike in implied volatility were also wrong. To keep things in context,
though, we remained up for the year at the end of February and with some
deft trading in March are now up over 3% year-to-date in the INCOME
strategy.
LAST MONTH'S
COMMENT...
Now let me take a few minutes of your time to
delve into one of the central questions being pondered by stock market
observers. People on Wall Street and heck, since so many of us and are
more and more sophisticated about investing, even a lot of us on Main
Street are wondering when the correction is coming. Now if you must ask,
“The correction of what?” And you’re mind bounces between…”That
erroneous charge on my credit card?” and “The way people pronounce my
name?” Well then, maybe you are not someone who’s wondering about the
correction.
Now since a correction is technically defined
as a 10% pullback, which we haven’t had in the Dow or the SP500 since
the bull market began in March of 2003, let’s set the bar a bit lower.
When are we going to at least get a 5% pullback? It’s been seven months
since the Dow has even had a 2% correction--the second longest stretch
ever. The SP500, which captures a much broader universe of stocks, has
also not had a 2% close-over-close drop since way back on my
birthday—July 14th. And in more evidence of the steady nature
of the market’s climb, the SP500 has rallied eight months in a row and
(when incorporating dividends) it’s been up 14 of the last 15! WOW!
So, back to the question—when are we going to
get at least a mini-correction, something that causes at least someone
to panic? My answer: not in the foreseeable future. For a pullback
notably more than 2%, we’re going to need a negative set of catalysts.
Remember, to get the nearly 8% pullback that the SP500 had last May and
June, several storm clouds had to gather. Inflation readings kept coming
in hot. Many more potential rate hikes were on the table. Bernanke was
new and untested. Housing was falling off a cliff. And the world’s
second largest economy, Japan, was dramatically tightening its monetary
base.
And now…
Inflation has
slowed. Oil (although it’s recent pop from around
$50 back to almost $60 must be watched) still remains 20% off its ’06
summer highs. And very recently, we received more evidence that one of
the frequent sources of inflation in a strong economic cycle that is
ageing—wage inflation—is hard to worry to much about. The employment
cost index was only up 0.8% in the final quarter of the year and wages
only grew 0.2% in January’s employment report. And just this morning,
another quarterly number, unit labor costs, came in at only +0.4% in the
fourth quarter or +1.7% annualized. With the backdrop of tamer oil
prices and in-check wage inflation, the Fed hasn’t raised rates since
last June and they are tantilizingly close to telling us that the rate
hike cycle is definitively over.
Bernanke has
now got his sea legs.
Remember how many people thought so little of
him back in May and June of last year when stocks were tumbling. “Who is
this homely guy with the beard?” “He talks too much!” “Has Greenspan
really left the building?” I have a client in whom Bernanke did not
engender any confidence. Before his scheduled appearances last spring,
this client would remind me to get out a box of Kleenex. “It’s tissue
time with Bernanke”, he’d say. Well, you can throw all of that out the
window. He now has as much gravitas or as Larry Kudlow puts it,
“monetary manhood”, as any one-year-old Fed head ever had.
When it comes
to housing; it seems to have at least stabilized. New home sales have been up notably for two
months in a row and are now at their highest level in nine months.
Existing home sales aren’t doing as well, but have been stable for the
last half-year. And maybe the biggest indicator of the future of
housing, the trend in homebuilder stocks, has been to the upside for
seven months. And lastly, don’t ignore long-term interest rates. Despite
backing up so far in early 2007, they are notably lower than in the
spring of 2006.
Lastly, the
Japanese have not raised rates or drained liquidity as much as many had
forecast they would.
Unlike most of the world’s economies, Japan’s
growth has been very lumpy in the last half-year and the Central Bank is
still keeping rates near historic lows.
Yes, of course, something else could always
hurt the market. There’s the chance of another 9-11, but in the realm of
developments whose chances can be better handicapped, we could look at,
say, the jobs market, which I’ve talked about as being very key.
However, it looks fine; we still have steady jobs growth. Earnings?
They remain strong; we’re headed towards a record 14th consecutive
quarters of double-digit earnings growth despite forecasts just a few
weeks ago that the streak would be broken. Long-term interest rates?
They remain well below 5%. The world’s economy outside the US? Other
than Japan, all of the world’s major economies are chugging along if not
accelerating.
You know what, maybe the strength of this bull market is revealed in the
fact that a friend of mine just had to really stretch to come up with a
reason to sell. He’s getting a sell signal from numerology. He didn’t
like the last three digits of yesterday’s close in the Dow…12666.
PAST RETURNS
ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS AND THE RISK OF LOSS IN TRADING COMMODITIES CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL.
YOU SHOULD, THEREFORE, CAREFULLY CONSIDER WHETHER SUCH TRADING
IS SUITABLE FOR YOU IN LIGHT OF YOUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.
_____
Year-by-Year Returns
for Be Free Investments
(NOTE: returns are
shown assuming no use of leverage...
2X and even 3X leveraged
trading is available*)
|
Strategy |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
2007 |
Total Return since 2002 |
|
INCOME (proprietary returns)** |
18.9% |
9.7% |
3.1% |
7.8% |
7.2% |
0.6% |
+56.3% |
|
INCOME client returns* |
6.7%*** |
5.4% |
1.5% |
5.6% |
5.1% |
0.4% |
+27.1% |
|
STOCKS PLUS |
-9.7% |
32.1% |
14.7% |
8.3% |
14.5% |
-1.1% |
+64.6% |
Past performance
is not indicative of future results.
*Leverage or what
is also referred to as notional funding can increase returns when
returns are positive, but will lead to larger losses when returns are
negative. Please review our disclosure documents at
www.BeFreeInvestments.com
to better understand the risks and rewards associated with leverage and
notional funding.
**These are returns
from proprietary accounts that have paid $10.50 in round turn
commissions and have been assessed a 20% incentive fee for its
lifetime. The returns achieved in proprietary accounts are higher
than those achieved in client accounts in aggregate. Contact us to discuss what kind
of commissions and fees we can offer you.
***The INCOME strategy
did not have customers investing in it for the full year of 2002.
____
The
STOCKS PLUS
investment strategy has been around since 1997. I started investing
client assets using this strategy five years before I formed Be Free
Investments. The STOCKS PLUS strategy and its returns are largely tied to
the performance of the U.S. stock market. It has met its objective of outperforming the
stock market nearly every year it's been around and is a great way to grow your
money in the longer term...
STOCKS PLUS STRATEGY
client returns without any use of leverage
|
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
|
+21.6% |
+30.6% |
+47.0% |
-9.7% |
Strategy did not trade |
-9.7% |
+32.1% |
+14.7% |
+8.3% |
+14.5% |
+1.8% |
Past performance
is not indicative of future results.
Feel
free to call us, so we can talk about what Be Free Investments can do
for you.
(800) 627-0449
or
(312)
604-2916
*The
returns of the INCOME strategy are for proprietary accounts. The
commissions and fees charged to proprietary accounts may differ from
those charged to customer accounts and may (although will not
necessarily) therefore relatively negatively effect the potential
returns a customer account could expect to have achieved. Please review
the disclosure documents at
www.BeFreeInvestments.com
to better
understand what a proprietary account is and how your returns will
differ from it and what the risks and rewards associated with leverage
or what is often called notional funding are.
___________
|